Release Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 Infinity Loader

[Pyrex BLJ]

imagine paying for gsc studio for 3 days at a time when it was the only injector available, no one would use gsc and it wouldn't have become nearly as advanced as it is now

 

[swoon]

Anyone can write this. Problem is PC cheats are easier to make better than GSC since we can put host stuff in our own cheats. There's simply no point into this program unless you dont know anything but gsc

 

[swoon]

Here is just a small fyi for anyone who is curious. If somebody does manage to crack the tool, all they will find is pictures and a readme file. Nothing important is in there.

Can i assume your readme file is just gonna be a link to your database to store logins and HWID? Lol.

 

[CabCon]

I think one of the biggest issues of a monthly subscription payment is that sometimes there are months where I'm not using any gsc injectors very active. Inject one project there, fixing and testing another there. To pay for this month would be quite useless. Another months I work on a daily basis on a project and at this point it would be quite fair.

In my opinion it should have an onetime open amount payment option. Like this:

• Cheap - 14,99€ (Cheapest version for everyone who didn't get much)
• Regular - 19,99€ (Normal price)
• Premium - 29,99€ + (Premium for everyone who want to support the project)

The versions are all the same just you can decide how much you want to pay and how much you think it's worth. At this point the Premium users support the missing amount of money for the people who bought Cheap. In Germany are a few projects with this payment system and it's working quite well.

 

[AgreedBog381]

I think one of the biggest issues of a monthly subscription payment is that... snip

We have thought about what to sell for awhile and at first it was number of compiles. So you would buy 500 compiles or 1000 but we realized this would be a bad purchase for developers. So we thought of selling time. But there is no monthly subscription or auto pay, you just buy more time if you run out and we have a variety of options.

3 day (For people who just want to try it)
Month (mainly for hosters)
Year (this is mainly for developers)

This isnt going to be an expensive tool.
A 3 day might cost 3$ we haven't decided yet.

 

[Dr.GiggleZ]

Hope pricing isn't to bad :\ lmao

 

[DF_AUS]

We have thought about what to sell for awhile and at first it was number of compiles. So you would buy 500 compiles or 1000 but we realized this would be a bad purchase for developers. So we thought of selling time. But there is no monthly subscription or auto pay, you just buy more time if you run out and we have a variety of options.

3 day (For people who just want to try it)
Month (mainly for hosters)
Year (this is mainly for developers)

This isnt going to be an expensive tool.
A 3 day might cost 3$ we haven't decided yet.

Could you at least offer bare minimum of 5 day free trial to begin with?
Once the free time/duration expires then people have the choice of paying or not?

Personally i think you would gain more sales from this approach, if people like what you have to offer i am certain they will have no issues paying to continue using your product

 

[AgreedBog381]

Could you at least offer bare minimum of 5 day free trial to begin with?
Once the free time/duration expires then people have the choice of paying or not?

Personally i think you would gain more sales from this approach, if people like what you have to offer i am certain they will have no issues paying to continue using your product

Yeah the first week on release was going to be free.

 

[CabCon]

We have thought about what to sell for awhile and at first it was number of compiles. So you would buy 500 compiles or 1000 but we realized this would be a bad purchase for developers. So we thought of selling time. But there is no monthly subscription or auto pay, you just buy more time if you run out and we have a variety of options.

3 day (For people who just want to try it)
Month (mainly for hosters)
Year (this is mainly for developers)

This isnt going to be an expensive tool.
A 3 day might cost 3$ we haven't decided yet.

I can understand you very good but I'm not sure if this will go in the right direction. I think one another big problem is that people who only want to try a menu one time have to purchase something. Not even the price, there are many people around the internet who don't have internet payment opportunities. They aren't able to get the tool.

The problem at this point would be that developer works won't get to the many people which will support that GSC won't go big like in Call of Duty: Black Ops 2.

The usage of a mod should be as easy as possible, a payment between makes thinks more difficult.

 

[AgreedBog381]

I can understand you very good but I'm not sure if this will go in the right direction. I think one another big problem is that people who only want to try a menu one time have to purchase something. Not even the price, there are many people around the internet who don't have internet payment opportunities. They aren't able to get the tool.

The problem at this point would be that developer works won't get to the many people which will support that GSC won't go big like in Call of Duty: Black Ops 2.

The usage of a mod should be as easy as possible, a payment between makes thinks more difficult.

This tool will not be as popular as GSC Studio or Black Ops 2 gsc because of it not being free. We know that and we would rather it be less popular. We want this to be for "premium" people only, so that everybody doesn't go and wreck cod. If everybody had a mod, then modding wouldn't be nearly as fun. I would say our target audience is more towards hosters rather than developers. We are also not opposed to giving out some free time to strong developers working to make something new for the public.

 

[swoon]

This tool will not be as popular as GSC Studio or Black Ops 2 gsc because of it not being free. We know that and we would rather it be less popular. We want this to be for "premium" people only, so that everybody doesn't go and wreck cod. If everybody had a mod, then modding wouldn't be nearly as fun. I would say our target audience is more towards hosters rather than developers. We are also not opposed to giving out some free time to strong developers working to make something new for the public.

First off, this is BS. You're just wanting money from a basic tool. Second of all, there are way more cheats out there for Call of Duty on other forums. Next, CoD especially MW3 is filled with cheaters who use my cheats since I actually provide nonhost and great cheats for free. There's plenty of C# tools out there as well that people use for other games. Honestly, I don't see a point in making GSC for CoD on PC, since everything is much easier finding offsets on PC, and just writing a basic application. Every CoD is practically already ruined, so there isn't really much to say about that on PC.

Edit: Especially I'm releasing Sesh Hooks for free, this is gonna be nothing compared to that. I mean why pay for something when you can get something better for free? I don't quite understand...

 

[Aurora51x]

First off, this is BS. You're just wanting money from a basic tool. Second of all, there's way more cheats out there for Call of Duty on other forums. Next, CoD especially MW3 is filled with cheaters who use my cheats since I actually provide nonhost and great cheats for free. There's plenty of C# tools out there as well that people use for other games. Honestly, I don't see a point in making GSC for CoD on PC, since everything is much easier finding offsets on PC, and just writing a basic application. Every CoD is practically already ruined, so there isn't really much to say about that on PC.

This man's cheats are Dank ASF!

 

[DF_AUS]

I agree with much that’s been said here.
Perhaps, charges should only be applied for MW3 usage with the tool, as you said @AgreedBog381, premium members who purchase the tool should have access to MW3, the others cod titles should be for free for anyone to use ( e.g Bo2 etc )
Overall, it’s still up to the developers ( you and who ever else ) with what they do with their product.
Good luck

 

[swoon]

I agree with much that’s been said here.
Perhaps, charges should only be applied for MW3 usage with the tool, as you said @AgreedBog381, premium members who purchase the tool should have access to MW3, the others cod titles should be for free for anyone to use ( e.g Bo2 etc )
Overall, it’s still up to the developers with what they do with their product.
Good luck

Problem is, this isn't gonna work on BO2. The reason behind that is for TAC. I'm pretty sure they don't have a way to bypass their screen shotting system. The tool is practically useless since there's cheats for each game that can do the same functions with off host. Plus BO2 isn't host like how it is with PS3 or XBOX360. It's based through server.

 

[CabCon]

This tool will not be as popular as GSC Studio or Black Ops 2 gsc because of it not being free. We know that and we would rather it be less popular. We want this to be for "premium" people only, so that everybody doesn't go and wreck cod. If everybody had a mod, then modding wouldn't be nearly as fun. I would say our target audience is more towards hosters rather than developers. We are also not opposed to giving out some free time to strong developers working to make something new for the public.

I totally understand your point. If your target group are premium coder and modder you are exactly doing the right think. These people will pay the amount to get the tool and will use it. Unfortunately I think this could destroy the project since there is not much content, tutorials or users to use the mods.

 

[AgreedBog381]

First off, this is BS. You're just wanting money from a basic tool. Second of all, there are way more cheats out there for Call of Duty on other forums. Next, CoD especially MW3 is filled with cheaters who use my cheats since I actually provide nonhost and great cheats for free. There's plenty of C# tools out there as well that people use for other games. Honestly, I don't see a point in making GSC for CoD on PC, since everything is much easier finding offsets on PC, and just writing a basic application. Every CoD is practically already ruined, so there isn't really much to say about that on PC.

Edit: Especially I'm releasing Sesh Hooks for free, this is gonna be nothing compared to that. I mean why pay for something when you can get something better for free? I don't quite understand...

No this is truly how we feel, otherwise the tool wouldn't be cheap, we arent just doing MW3, we have them all working. Also I think the majority of people would rather have gsc mods over the non host esp/aimbot menus. Part of the reason for that is how easy gsc is to pickup whereas most people don't know a real programming lang.

 

[AgreedBog381]

I totally understand your point. If your target group are premium coder and modder you are exactly doing the right think. These people will pay the amount to get the tool and will use it. Unfortunately I think this could destroy the project since there is not much content, tutorials or users to use the mods.

Yeah your completely right, there really isn't much support for gsc on this side of cod. And that's where we will give out free time to developers willing to make something for the public as a way to kickstart it some more. Overtime depending on how this does, we have an idea for a gsc shop, where you can buy somebodys gsc menu they dont want released and have uploaded to our shop.

 

[swoon]

No this is truly how we feel, otherwise the tool wouldn't be cheap, we arent just doing MW3, we have them all working. Also I think the majority of people would rather have gsc mods over the non host esp/aimbot menus. Part of the reason for that is how easy gsc is to pickup whereas most people don't know a real programming lang.

I disagree. Plus there's many options in my menu for host. Also, there's plenty of C# tools out there that are mods only. The one thing that operates thst is yours are in game and theres aren't. Can i ask how you plan on doing BO2 when there's no host for it and you have TAC?

 

[AgreedBog381]

I disagree. Plus there's many options in my menu for host. Also, there's plenty of C# tools out there that are mods only. The one thing that operates thst is yours are in game and theres aren't. Can i ask how you plan on doing BO2 when there's no host for it and you have TAC?

We aren't supporting bo2 or any treyarc games. The compiler they use is completely different.

 

[swoon]

we arent just doing MW3, we have them all working.

We aren't supporting bo2 or any treyarc games. The compiler they use is completely different.

I thought you were doing all the CoDs?